Project

General

Profile

Actions

Task #1154

closed

add IPv6 to manitu servers

Added by Florian Effenberger about 9 years ago. Updated almost 5 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Low
Category:
Domains and DNS
Target version:
Team - Pool
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Tags:

Description

The manitu servers currently come without IPv6 - the VM hosts do not have it, while the VMs have it

Actions #1

Updated by Florian Effenberger about 9 years ago

  • Subject changed from add IPv6 to falco to add IPv6 to manitu root servers and big boxes
Actions #2

Updated by Florian Effenberger over 8 years ago

  • Subject changed from add IPv6 to manitu root servers and big boxes to add IPv6 to manitu servers
  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #3

Updated by Florian Effenberger over 8 years ago

  • Target version set to Pool
Actions #4

Updated by Dennis Roczek over 8 years ago

  • Category set to Domains and DNS
Actions #5

Updated by Florian Effenberger about 8 years ago

Is there a lot of work involved? Before groing our infra, it might make sense to get this dealt with, now that Debian 8 is rolled out
It's still not high priority, so if it takes lots of resources, we can defer - interested to hear if it takes a lot of effort (e.g. wrt. firewalling and routing).

Actions #6

Updated by Alexander Werner about 8 years ago

It's just stupid work that takes some time.
Good time during the migration on the rack.

Actions #7

Updated by Alexander Werner about 8 years ago

  • Related to Task #1835: migration to own rack added
Actions #8

Updated by Florian Effenberger almost 8 years ago

  • Target version changed from Pool to Qlater

Shifting to later due to the infra changes

Actions #9

Updated by Florian Effenberger over 7 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Alexander Werner to Guilhem Moulin

re-assigning to Guilhem in order to clean up Redmine queues
nothing concrete to do at the moment

Actions #10

Updated by Florian Effenberger about 7 years ago

I read something about IPv6 firewalling in the recent agenda - is this still an issue, or has this ticket been dealt with?

Actions #11

Updated by Florian Effenberger almost 7 years ago

A sudo ifconfig | grep inet6 on the big manitu boxes yield only fe80:: addresses, so it seems to be pending still indeed ;-)

Actions #12

Updated by Florian Effenberger almost 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from Qlater to Q4/2017
Actions #13

Updated by Florian Effenberger over 6 years ago

  • Related to deleted (Task #1835: migration to own rack)
Actions #14

Updated by Florian Effenberger about 6 years ago

  • Target version changed from Q4/2017 to Q2/2018

With this ticket being regularly shifted, I wonder how much work the task entails and what other constraints apply
Major firewall topics?
Adjustments for Gluster?
I'd like to prioritize this one accordingly
It's not a big deal, but still something we IMHO should "just do" if possible :)

Maybe for one of the next maintenance windows, when there's a downtime anyways?

Actions #15

Updated by Guilhem Moulin about 6 years ago

Florian Effenberger wrote:

Major firewall topics?
Adjustments for Gluster?

Neither. The firewall will stay shut (only TCP/22 for incoming packets), and Glusterd will keep chatting in the private v4 space (using the 10G pipe that can be found in the rack).

I'd like to prioritize this one accordingly
It's not a big deal, but still something we IMHO should "just do" if possible :)

Yeah but it falls in the “nice to have” category as v6-only admins can still reach the boxes. In fact the only thing I can think of where lacking v6 would hit us is if one of the very few hosts these boxes try to reach (deb.debian.org, mail.documentfoundation.org, and it's pretty much it) removes v4 records. And that's veeery unlikely.

Maybe for one of the next maintenance windows, when there's a downtime anyways?

No need to bring the network (let alone the host) down to do this.

Actions #16

Updated by Florian Effenberger about 6 years ago

  • Target version changed from Q2/2018 to Pool

Ok, then let's de-prioritize that and put it to pool

Actions #17

Updated by Florian Effenberger almost 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Rejected

Let's drop this one - not really important

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF