Support #599
closed
Added by Joel Madero over 10 years ago.
Updated about 10 years ago.
Description
We talked about using non-bugzilla trackers on the ESC call and dicided we really dont want that for anything directly related to the code we ship -- and the rest -- most of that is related to some kind of infrastructure, so can be filed there. Here is the list of QA-related issues on bugzilla (keyed by whiteboard status TopicQA):
QA-related issues
If in doubt though, file your issue on bugzilla: Its the most visible tracker we have.
Thus the "QA project" on RedMine is closed, please dont file new stuff here.
Whops, missed this one previously!
IMHO, as much as possible should be on FDO -- and that means almost everything.
The only exceptions I see are:
- when there are special credentials needed
- ... (actually I cant think of anything else)
So, of the current open issues here on RM I see only #592, #593, #597, #606 qualify for that -- and all of those are actually infrastructure topics that just happen to be about infra for QA. I see those would perfectly fine fit into the infrastructure project.
As for the rest: They are much better suited to be on FDO (or whereever our bugzilla is) and a lot of them even QA-EasyHack that might generate an unsuspecting new contributor: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Easy_Hacks
As discussed on the ESC: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/minutes-of-ESC-call-td4123642.html
+ how is redmine used for QA ? (Robinson)
+ specific admin pieces tracked in there.
+ happy to use bugzilla for that purpose
+ might already fit in the existing infra in Redmine ? (Bjoern)
+ could we merge those & close the project ?
AI: + move the data across to infra / bugzilla (Bjoern)
+ easy to do now - only 10x tasks or so.
+ sometimes there is infra not maintained by infra team (Robinson)
so waiting a few more days as a grace period and then will move issues from "Redmine/QA" to "Redmine/Infrastructure" for stuff that is about any kind of infrastructure and the rest back into the public on Bugzilla for better visibility.
- Assignee set to Florian Effenberger
Project QA does not have any open issue anymore.
@Florian: Can we "close" this project? Ideally by making it impossible to file new stuff here, while keeping existing issues available.
- Description updated (diff)
Ruthlessly updated description.
- Description updated (diff)
- Project changed from 49 to Infrastructure
- Assignee changed from Florian Effenberger to Bjoern Michaelsen
Moving this to infra, stealing the issue, trying to disable the tracker myself (just found the settings and I am a manager of the QA project).
- Status changed from New to Closed
after 5 or 6 tries, I figured it out myself. => closing
Also available in: Atom
PDF